Interviews
Meet Jeff Knite Director The Omicron Killer
About You and Your background ?
I was born and raised in Bronx, New York. In the 80’s and early 90’s my dad worked for a big modeling agency called Wilhelmina Models. He would bring me to work alot, so I got to meet alot of famous people at the time, like Robin Williams, Eddie Murphy, Sylvester Stallone, Cindy Crawford, Ronald Reagan, just to name a few. To this day I still have a photo of my Dad play choking Robin Williams (LOL).
Anyway, being around all these celebrities at such a young age got me dreaming about being an actor. It just seem so cool. I would get paid to be a different person all the time. To me, it was awesome. So I began acting in my early 20’s, around 1997. I eventually landed a big role in the film BORICUA’S BOND (2000), co-starring with legendary rapper Big Pun. I then got cast in MANITO (2002), a film that went on to win best film at the Tribeca Film Festival and Special Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival. The following year I snagged a role in the critically acclaimed film RAISING VICTOR VARGAS (2003), which was shown at Sundance, Cannes and the Toronto International Film Festival. I stop auditioning for film projects because I got married and had two kids, which made my available time now very limited. So I decided to become a filmmaker. I figured if I started out making short films. It would allow me to work at my own pace while learning the craft, and I was right for the most part.
You see, being an independent filmmaker is very hard work. Because you’re trying to do something to get noticed in Hollywood, without a Hollywood budget or crew. When you look at the credits on a hollywood production, it’s like 10 minutes long. Hundreds of people are helping in making that film a success. When you look at a low to no budget film, the credits are like 2 minutes long, with 10 people listed, all having multiple credits. That’s why you see most independent film’s opening credits are.. Directed by John Doe , Written by John Doe, Produced by John Doe, Casting by John Doe, Catering by John Doe etc. etc. The point I’m trying to make is that it’s tough, and it can put a strain on your relationships in life with loved ones and friends. That’s why I have been engaged three times and married twice. Not everyone thinks you’re going to become a Hollywood Star. They just think you’re an a–hole that is using up all their time and money.
The good thing is I did have some success over the years. My first short film SOME WOUNDS (2004), premiered at Urbanworld Film Festival, in front of the Tom Cruise/Jamie Foxx film Collateral (2004). It also appeared at the New York International Latino Film Festival that same year, sponsored by HBO.
I then made 9 more short films that were shown in various film festivals. From 2010 to 2011 I produced and directed 6 Doritos Commercials. I also produced a feature film entitled THE BUSINESSMAN (2014). AMERICAN PIRATES (2017) was the first feature film I directed, WAITING FOR HOWARD STERN (2018) was my second. Last year Gravitas Ventures released my film The Covid Killer, a Horror Crime Thriller. The film became an instant cult classic amongst Horror fans and currently holds an 87% Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score and spawned the sequel I am currently working on called The Omicron Killer.
How do you convince yourself with things that you have to shoot for a film but you actually don’t otherwise believe ?
I no longer shoot anything that I don’t believe in. The first feature I shot was written by a very close friend of mine, who is like a brother to me.
I read his script and did not understand it. It seemed to be all over the place. But we were close and he assured me that once the film was done it would all make sense. Well guess what? Once the film was done and edited, it made even less sense. The film was terrible. The day after I watched that film that we spent years working on, I vowed to never commit to doing something that I did not 100% believe in. Of course sometimes you get suckered into doing things you don’t want, like what happened to me when I started shooting The Covid Killer. But that is a story for another day.
Your Scripting Process ? Your approach to casting ?
I don’t start out writing a script. I come up with an idea and start putting notes into a folder and every now and then I would brainstorm these ideas with writer friends of mine and kind of form the story. Then, may be months or even years later I return to the story and start to flesh it out and see what ideas work and where would they go in the timeline of the film. The ideas that don’t work are placed in the sequel folder or in a folder called future projects.
As for casting. I usually first give offers to the actors that I usually work with that are good and reliable. The left over roles are usually given to someone well known that someone involved in the project knows, like a celebrity or thespian, and then we usually put an Ad in backstage or Craigslist and hold auditions, but if they have a really good reel, I’ll just hire them over the phone.
How much does your life influences your story telling and the characters that you bring to life ?
In the beginning, a lot. Most of the stories I told when I was younger were very personal.Now, not so much. I’m building a fictional universe now with my new film THE OMICRON KILLER, So nothing in these films will be about my life.
But I am writing a film about the relationship I have with my wife, who I am now separated from. But that story is very dear to my heart and I probably will not film that for years to come, if ever.
How do you work on yourself to become better in your field learning , observing , reading ? Type of things you keep yourself involved with
I do what you just said. I’m constantly learning, observing and reading. Either from friends, youtube, documentaries or just going on line and googling how to do things. Knowledge is power. Once you learn something, you can’t unlearn it. You give a man a fish, he eats for a day. You teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime.
Filmmaking is team work. Tell us about your team and what sort of pre planning gets done before you decide to make a film. Tough things about making films and what keeps you going despite those tough things ?
My team consist of Paugh Shadow, Johnny Careccia, Chris Guttadaro, Kianna Skye, Aaron Hilton, Roz Clancy, Evilise QuiJano, Dexter Fenner, Chris Lazzaro, Josh Trovato and Tasos Eliopoulos. Everything is pre-planned. There is so much that goes into it, but that would take up too much time so I am just going to gloss over the esentials: Idea – Treatment – Screenplay – Copyright – Shooting Schedule – Script Breakdown – Crew – Cast – Concept Art – Storyboard – Money – Weather – Contracts – Props – Shooting The Film – Organizing & Labeling Video And Audio FIles – Editing – SFX – Sound Design – Music – Score – Promotional Material (Posters, Banners, Trailers, etc.) – Sales Agent – Deliverables – Distribuition – Publicist – FIlm Festivals – Marketing Campaigns – Release Date – Interviews – Press Releases….
It’s mind boggling and extremely overwhelming just thinking about what you know you need to do to get a film project off the ground.
Title Of Your New Release
THE OMICRON KILLER
What is the central theme of film ?
Well we all know that serial killers want to become famous. They want attention.Well what happens when you are a copycat of a famous serial killer who dies and is still stealing the spotlight from you.
This film is about that guy.
The Copycat Covid Killer is so jealous of The Covid Killer who died 2 years earlier, because even in death he gets more exposure and notoriety than him. So he goes on a murdering rampage to prove he’s numero uno.
how many days it took you to shoot ? What locations it has been shot at ?
We have not shot the film yet, but it will take 27 days to shoot.
Here is our kickstarter campaign link
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/910161385/the-omicron-killer-movie?ref=nav_search&result=project&term=theomicronkiller
Share your thoughts about production process. Any interesting trivia about its making ?
It’s grueling as I mentioned above. A lot of work and you are not getting paid.
What platforms will the film be released? Date of release?
Theatrical and we are aiming for HBO Max.Halloween 2023
Any other project you are working on ? Some details about the film ?
I’m also working on a film called KRAZY KLOWNY. I don’t want to give any details on that project at this time.
You will get to see him for a little bit in THE OMICRON KILLER though.
How do you deal with Negative Feedbacks? How do you stay balanced with Positive Feedback?
Trolls.. I recognize them and then ignore them. You build on the positive and deflect the negative.
How did you hear about CarryOnHarry ? Any message for Studio ? Josh Mitchell PUB.LIE.SIZE
Jason Blum, give me a call. I’m ready for you. Hollywood might not be ready for me, but I’m coming anyway.
IMDB Link
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/jeff_knite
Your Official Website
https://www.youtube.com/c/DarkKnitesentertainment
Twitter Handle
Powered by SgAiSolution
Interviews
Long Beach Actor Ray Buffer Plays Villain in Sci-Fi Western Short at New Local Film Festival
Long Beach character actor Ray Buffer takes on a villain role in "The Lord of All Future Space and Time," a sci-fi western short screening as part of the inaugural Long Beach Film Festival, according to the announcement.
The festival marks the first edition of a new event on the city’s cultural calendar, running August 28 and 29 at the historic Art Theatre in Long Beach’s Retro Row district, according to festival promotion. The short screens Saturday, August 29, at noon, according to the announcement and other festival listings.
Buffer is a Long Beach-based character actor whose work spans decades, with a resume that includes western villains, mobsters and more nuanced parts in historical docudramas, according to background material on his career. He’s described as known for a commanding presence and a deep voice, traits that line up with the villain role he plays in this short. His social media has also referenced involvement in a separate sci-fi animated short tied to the festival’s opening, though it’s not clear from available material whether that refers to the same project or a different one screening the same weekend.
No director, cast list beyond Buffer, or plot synopsis for "The Lord of All Future Space and Time" was included in the announcement. Ticket and program details for the full festival lineup were not specified in the material provided.
Powered by SgAiSolution
Interviews
Tagore Almeida discusses the deeply personal journey behind SALIGIA
SALIGIA: Tagore Almeida on the Seven Deadly Sins, the Virtues Within Us, and the War We Fight Inside
In conversation with Studio CarryOnHarry, author Tagore Almeida discusses the deeply personal journey behind SALIGIA, a mythological fantasy that turns an ancient framework of vice into an exploration of courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love.
For centuries, the seven deadly sins have provided a vocabulary for examining human weakness. Pride, envy, anger, greed, lust, excess and apathy have appeared across religious teaching, philosophy and culture in different forms.
But what happens when we stop asking only what is wrong with us—and begin asking what already exists within us to confront those weaknesses?
That question sits at the heart of SALIGIA.
Drawing upon an ancient Latin mnemonic traditionally associated with the seven deadly sins, author and filmmaker Tagore Almeida turns the familiar structure on its head. Instead of building his story solely around human failings, he constructs a symbolic world around seven countervailing virtues: courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love.
For Almeida, the idea is also deeply personal. Born Catholic in Goa before life took him through Britain, the Middle East and Asia, his encounters with different cultures, beliefs and people gradually led him to question whether the behaviours traditionally described as “sins” belong to any one religion at all—or simply to humanity.
In this conversation with Studio CarryOnHarry, Almeida talks about the origins of SALIGIA, why a house became central to its mythology, how the external and internal battles of the story intersect, and why he ultimately came to believe that virtue may be less about becoming someone new than remembering something already within us.
Studio CarryOnHarry: SALIGIA takes its title from a Latin mnemonic traditionally associated with the seven deadly sins, yet your novel uses that framework to explore virtue. What drew you personally to this piece of theological history?
Tagore Almeida: What fascinated me about SALIGIA was never really the religious label attached to it. It was the humanity hiding underneath.
Harry, I was born Catholic in Goa, so the idea of the seven deadly sins was part of the landscape I grew up with. Over time, I became disillusioned with certain aspects of organised religion, but Catholicism remained part of my cultural and emotional foundation. So SALIGIA was familiar territory.
Then life took me elsewhere—Britain, the Middle East, Asia—and I found myself genuinely connecting with people of many different faiths, and with people of no faith at all.
I became curious. Were these so-called “deadly sins” uniquely Christian ideas, or were they simply human behaviours that religions had given different names to?
The more I looked, the more I realised that pride, envy, anger, greed, lust, excess and apathy appear in one form or another almost everywhere—sometimes through religion, sometimes through philosophy, and sometimes simply through culture and family. Apparently, humanity has been remarkably consistent in its weaknesses.
But eventually a more interesting question occurred to me. Instead of continually asking, “What is wrong with us?” I began wondering, “What already exists within us that can confront what is wrong?”
That changed the book completely.
I have always been fascinated by the invisible parts of human beings—compassion, courage, kindness. Whether I am writing fiction, making a film, recording a podcast or attempting poetry, I seem to arrive, rather annoyingly, at the same question:
Who are we when nobody is watching?
SALIGIA gave me an ancient framework within which to explore that. The sins gave me the architecture. The virtues gave me a reason to walk inside.
Studio CarryOnHarry: That architecture becomes quite literal in the book: an ancestral dwelling with rooms representing courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love. Why did a house become the setting for this inversion?
Tagore Almeida: A house felt natural because a house is never just architecture. It holds memory. It holds the things we proudly display in the sitting room and the things we quietly push into cupboards and hope nobody ever opens.
Human beings are rather like that. We all have rooms we happily invite people into, and other rooms we avoid ourselves.
When I began shaping SALIGIA, I also made a conscious decision not to fill the story with identifiable human characters. The moment you give someone a face, name, nationality or religion, readers naturally begin placing them into categories.
I wanted to remove those distractions as much as possible. I wanted the reader to encounter the ideas before encountering identity. So the house became the character.
Once that happened, the inversion became quite natural. Instead of seven compartments representing human failure, I imagined seven spaces representing what might stand against those failures: courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love.
The house also allowed me to explore virtue without turning the book into a seventy-five-page sermon. Nobody really wants that. I certainly wouldn’t.
I wanted readers to move through something rather than simply be told something—to open doors, enter rooms and discover what has been forgotten, neglected, protected or perhaps left waiting quietly in the dark.
In many ways, the house became a metaphor for the self.
We spend an extraordinary amount of our lives searching outside ourselves for answers—in success, possessions, religion, status, technology, relationships, recognition and approval.
We keep renovating the outside of the house.
SALIGIA quietly asks a different question: What if some of the rooms we have spent our whole lives searching for were already inside us?
Perhaps courage, compassion, humility and love are not things we need to acquire. Perhaps they are rooms we simply need to reopen.
Studio CarryOnHarry: That leads to one of the book’s central ideas—that these virtues may already exist within us. Why was that important to you?
Tagore Almeida: Because I am simply not convinced that human beings arrive as empty vessels waiting to be filled with goodness. Harry, I think we already arrive with quite a lot of it.
Look at children. Before the world starts handing them labels, they share, care and comfort one another. They are curious about animals, fascinated by nature and capable of affection without first asking what religion, race, nationality or social class somebody belongs to.
That, to me, is humanity in a fairly pure form. Then life begins adding layers.
Religion, race, politics, family, community, fear, ambition, prejudice, success—all of these begin shaping us, sometimes obviously and sometimes so quietly that we barely notice.
Watch a child comfort another child who is crying. There is no philosophy involved. No scripture. No management seminar on empathy. Something instinctive simply responds.
Perhaps life then complicates us. We accumulate ambition, fear, disappointment, comparison, possessions, prejudice, success and, if we are especially fortunate, an impressive job title to put on LinkedIn.
Somewhere along the way, we become very sophisticated at forgetting very simple things.
SALIGIA was never intended to say, “Here are seven virtues you need to acquire.” That sounded suspiciously like homework.
Instead, the book asks something gentler, but perhaps more uncomfortable:
What if you already possess them?
And if courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love are already somewhere within us, the real question is no longer how we acquire them.
The question becomes why, sometimes, we choose not to use them.
Studio CarryOnHarry: The subtitle draws a distinction between an external evil and an internal war. How do those two journeys intersect for Salem and Medea?
Tagore Almeida: The external journey gives the story movement. The internal journey gives it meaning.
Think of something ordinary. You hear that someone you know has spoken badly about you behind your back. That moment happens outside you. The person may move on with their day, forget about it entirely and go on to lunch.
But the hurt stays with you.
You replay it. You question the relationship. You feel anger, disappointment, perhaps even the temptation to retaliate.
The act happened outside. The battle began within.
That is very much the tension at the heart of SALIGIA.
Salem and Medea move through a world where danger appears to exist around them, so naturally they respond to what they can see. That is how most of us live. We identify the problem as the difficult person, unfair circumstance, hostile environment, institution, stranger or enemy.
Sometimes we are absolutely right. There is real cruelty, injustice and darkness in the world.
But what happens outside us also has a way of revealing what exists inside us.
Fear reveals courage. Cruelty tests compassion. Power tests humility. Betrayal tests forgiveness. Temptation tests integrity.
Once you begin looking at life that way, the outward journey and inward journey start reflecting one another.
That is really where the subtitle came from:
The evil is outside. The war is within.
We cannot control every act of cruelty, betrayal, injustice or temptation that enters our lives. But we do have some responsibility for what those experiences turn us into.
For me, that is a far more interesting battle than simply defeating a villain.
Studio CarryOnHarry: SALIGIA brings mythology, spirituality, philosophy and fantasy together. How did you prevent those elements from competing with one another?
Tagore Almeida: Very slowly.
SALIGIA first began forming in my mind sometime in the early 2010s, so it lived with me for many years before becoming a finished book. Perhaps that helped.
I never wanted to force it into existence simply because writers are apparently expected to finish things on schedule. Life, rather inconsiderately, kept happening.
I made films, went to Cannes, changed countries, built a career, raised a family, wrote other things, recorded conversations and experimented with music—and somewhere in the background, SALIGIA kept waiting.
Moving between different creative forms taught me quite a lot about how to write it.
Film teaches you that sometimes an image should do the talking. Music teaches you that silence is also part of the composition. Podcasting teaches you that people often become most interesting when you stop trying to make them sound interesting.
And writing, I discovered, requires the discipline to know when to explain and when simply to leave the door open.
Whenever the philosophy became too loud, I returned to the story. Whenever the fantasy began feeling merely decorative, I asked myself what that scene was actually saying about being human. And whenever the spiritual dimension sounded too certain, I deliberately returned to questions.
I am far more comfortable with spirituality that invites reflection than spirituality that claims to have completed the examination and obtained all the answers.
I did not want mythology to become a costume for philosophy, and I did not want philosophy to interrupt the adventure.
Ideally, one had to quietly carry the other.
The mythology builds the world. The story takes you through it. And the questions, hopefully, are what remain with you after the final page.
Studio CarryOnHarry: Spending years writing about seven vices and their opposing virtues must inevitably turn some of that examination back on the writer. Did SALIGIA change you?
Tagore Almeida: Absolutely.
Rather inconveniently, the reflection revealed how wonderfully unfinished I still am.
The danger of writing about virtue is that, at some point, the manuscript starts interviewing the author.
You write about humility, and suddenly your own ego clears its throat. You write about forgiveness, and a few names from the past appear uninvited. You write about compassion, and you have to ask whether your compassion really extends to everyone—or only to people who behave in ways you approve of.
That was probably the most personal part of writing SALIGIA. I began with ideas about vice and virtue, but eventually those ideas became mirrors.
Courage changed for me quite significantly.
We often imagine courage as something grand and cinematic—standing against armies, confronting monsters, making enormous sacrifices.
But I have come to think that some of the bravest things we do are much quieter.
Sometimes courage is admitting you were wrong. Sometimes it is apologising first. Sometimes it is asking for help. Sometimes it is refusing to become bitter.
And sometimes it is continuing to be kind when life has given you perfectly reasonable evidence that kindness may not always offer the best return on investment. That last one is particularly challenging.
But I should make one thing very clear: SALIGIA did not leave me believing that I had somehow mastered courage, humility, compassion, forgiveness or any of the virtues in the book.
Quite the opposite.
It made me realise that virtue is not something we achieve, frame and hang on the wall.
It is something we choose. Again and again.
Some days we choose rather well. Other days, spectacularly badly.
Perhaps that is part of being human. We are all works in progress, occasionally pretending to be finished products.
And tomorrow gives us another chance to do a little better.
Studio CarryOnHarry: When readers reach the final page, what do you hope they carry away from SALIGIA?
Tagore Almeida: I hope it feels quiet.
Not triumphant. Not like someone has just handed the reader seven rules for becoming a better human being.
I would much rather they close the final page, sit for a moment, and recognise something familiar inside themselves.
Maybe they remember a time when they were courageous without ever calling it courage.
Perhaps they forgave someone when anger would have been easier. Perhaps they helped a stranger and never told anyone. Perhaps they remained kind after life had given them every reason not to be.
That kind of recognition matters to me because we live in a world constantly telling us that we are incomplete.
We need more success. More money. More followers. More knowledge. More possessions. More certainty.
Apparently, somewhere out there is the final missing piece that will make us whole.
SALIGIA quietly suggests something almost unfashionable:
What if something valuable is already there?
What if, beneath the ambition, disappointment, fear, labels, noise and everything else life has placed around us, there is still a decent human being trying to remember the way home?
I do not want a reader to finish SALIGIA thinking, “Now I understand virtue.”
I would much rather they think:
“I remember that part of myself.”
Perhaps even:
“I still have that within me.”
If one reader reaches that moment, then the book has done what I hoped it would do.
Not teach them how to become good.
Simply remind them that some goodness was there all along.
Closing Note
There is an interesting contradiction at the centre of SALIGIA. Its vocabulary begins with sin, but its destination is not condemnation. It is remembrance.
Across this conversation, Tagore Almeida repeatedly returns to the idea that the most important human qualities may not be trophies to be earned or lessons to be imposed from outside. Courage can appear in an apology. Compassion can exist without doctrine. Forgiveness can happen without an audience. Integrity can be tested in moments nobody else will ever see.
Perhaps that is why the image of the house is so effective.
We spend much of our lives, as Almeida puts it, “renovating the outside”—pursuing achievement, recognition, certainty and approval. SALIGIA turns the reader towards the rooms within.
And its question is ultimately simpler than its mythology:
What if becoming better is sometimes less about finding something new—and more about remembering what we already carry?
— Studio CarryOnHarry
Powered by SgAiSolution
-
Books5 days agoChristopher Mirabile Sends Police Chief Silas Lopez Back to Cape Cod in “The Holdfast”
-
Authors and Artists4 days agoDr. Zee Publishing Adds Ten Titles to Its Children’s Book Universe, Anchored by a Recurring Cast
-
Books5 days agoFormer Army Officer Steven Finch Debuts Four-Book Mercenary Thriller Series
-
Books5 days agoFinal Chapter: Garphil Bowles Completes Crime Trilogy with ‘Tears Of A Goon’
-
Books4 days agoNew Book Frames Author’s Experience of Schizophrenia as a Spiritual Awakening
-
Editor's Choice2 days agoPrime Video India’s August-September slate: a cop drama, a reality reboot and a Carnatic music saga
