Editor's Choice

Interview with Subhrajit Mitra : Devi Chowdhurani…Bandit Queen of Bengal

Published

3 years ago

August 10, 2023

Johal

Interview with Subhrajit Mitra : Devi Chowdhurani…Bandit Queen of Bengal

Share this post

Total shares: 0

Subhrajit Mitra‘s creative odyssey has been a tapestry woven with passion, learning, and an unwavering commitment to his vision. In this exclusive interview, we delve into the mind of Subhrajit Mitra, unraveling the intricacies of his creative process, the inspiration that fuels his stories, and the upcoming cinematic film that promises to captivate audiences worldwide. Join us as we venture into the heart of cinematic artistry with a director whose narratives resonate beyond the screen.

About You and Your background ? Lets begin days when you were aspiring to be , Days When you became what you are , professional upgrades in your journey?

Subhrajit Mitra Devi Chowdhurani...Bandit Queen of Bengal I have completed my bachelors degree in Computer science and Engineering from a premier university of India. After that I have done a certificate course in ancient Classical literature from the Harvard University and got my Honorary Doctorate in Literature from a reputed university of South India. I used to make documentaries for Government of India [ Defence and Home ministry ] and also for National Geographic Channel, Discovery and History Channel. I have learned the process of film making all by myself. Studying extensively in American ,British, German and Russian libraries and watching world classics in theatres and film festivals. I aspired to be a director, when I was 13/14 years old, after watching E.T. by Steven Spielberg in a theatre and pursued my dream ever since.

How do you convince yourself with things that you have to shoot for a film but you actually don’t otherwise believe?

I don’t shoot anything which I don’t believe in. simple, period. I am extremely choosy and strict about this from the very beginning. Absolutely no compromise, whatsoever.

Your Scripting Process ? Your approach to casting ?

I prefer classical literatures with historical background. Making period pieces gives the opportunity to research, to recreate the history which is fascinating. First if any classic literature appeals me, I start researching on the time period , the customs, the political and social scenario, the attires and many more detailed aspects. Then I study other notable literature and biographies of the noted personalities of that same time period for cross referencing and to incorporate that in my screenplay. And then I write the script organically. And I still use fountain pen to write a script rather than a computer as I prefer the human touch more.

Casting is very intuitive and organic process for me from the scripting stage itself.

How much does your life influences your story telling and the characters that you bring to life ?

To some extent, I try to incorporate my philosophical thoughts in the dialogues. I choose only those stories which is appealing to me personally, which I want to tell in the big screen.

How do you work on yourself to become better in your field learning, observing, reading ?

I am voracious reader. And I watch movies a lot. mainly films based on literatures. That’s the way I continuously upgrade myself.

Filmmaking is team work. Tell us about your team and what sort of pre planning gets done before you decide to make a film. Tough things about making films and what keeps you going despite those tough things ?

I choose my team according to the genre and subjects. If that means repeating someone, I don’t mind. But since I am working in the industry for quite sometime and best of the technicians and actors are all my friends, it’s easy to pick and choose for each individual project. They are all available for me as per my requirements. The kind of film I make, I do all the research, I choose the subject and the story, I write the screenplay, I do the production designing and I also Direct. So it takes longer than usual as I spearhead all these departments all by myself [ I have assistants in production design and directorial department only, and it’s by choice . But I enjoy the entire process. I don’t find it tough. Only the budget and finance factors are stressful for me, not the creative aspects.

Title Of Your New Release

Devi Chowdhurani…Bandit Queen of Bengal

What is the central theme of film ?

I was studying and researching on the Battle of Plassey, Battle of Buxar, The Great Bengal Famine of 1770 and the Sanyasi and Fakir Rebellion which spans across this era. Off course this includes the advent and invasion of the British East India Company in India in it’s early years. Co-incidentally “Anandamath” and “Devi Chowdhurani” by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay are based on the similar timescale where I find the latter is more appealing in terms of a Film. It narrates a journey of a simple village girl who eventually becomes the first Indian woman freedom fighter, historically, against the colonial rule in India in the later part of the 18th century.

Subhrajit Mitra Devi Chowdhurani...Bandit Queen of Bengal I felt this story through my cinematic interpretation would be my humble homage to my Motherland in her 75th year of independence. It also tells the story of the Hindu ascetic monks who had no other option but to take up arms against the British colonial rules to save the country and her people. It was the first armed revolution by the Indians , led by Bhavani Charan Pathak, against the British East India Company. I only had to adapt the storyline into the alternative historical interpretation.

The basic plotline remains the same but almost 80% of the film is closer to the actual history, rather than the novel. It is built on the premise of “what might have actually happened”. Even Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay wrote the novel almost after a 100 year of the original incidents. I had to study extensively from the archives of East India Company in London, several texts and manuscripts from Asiatic society, British Library, Victoria Memorial and Indian Museum.

how many days it took you to shoot ? What locations it has been shot at ?

We have planned for a shoot of close to 60 days. The film will be extensively shoot in various locations across West Bengal named Purulia, Kolkata & Bolpur.

Share your thoughts about production process . Any interesting trivia about its making ?

“Devi Chowdhurani” [ Bandit Queen of Bengal ], gives me the opportunity to get me out of my comfort zone. It is much bigger canvas than my last film, it is actually a part of our lesser known history. After winning my National award for my last film “Avijatrik” [ The Wanderlust of Apu ], I wanted to tell this story, the urge was intense. I wanted to make a very realistic film on this novel and the time period which portrays a plausible historical reconstruction. I am fascinated by the films of similar genre by the master directors such as Akira Kurosawa and Ridley Scott. The seven samurai, Roshomon, Ran, Throne of blood, Gladiator, Robinhood to name a few.

What platforms will the film be released? Date of release?

The film will be released in Autumn 2024 and will be available globally across various leading platform as well as wide theatrical release.

Any other project you are working on ? Some details about the film ?

There are few others but right now my entire concentration is on Devi Chowdhurani. One project at a time.

How do you deal with Negative Feedbacks ? How do you stay balanced with Positive Feedback ?

I am my biggest critic. Despite winning several prestigious international and national awards, including the highest film award from the Government of India, from the President herself, I still consider myself a student. I have achieved only 40% of my full potential. I read and listen to all feedbacks, negative and positive. And then delete all those from my mind. To me film making is a lonesome, organic process.

How did you hear about CarryOnHarry ? Any message for Studio? Any Suggestion that we can make it better?

Heard about it from my friends in Hollywood. You are doing great stuff and pls keep helping independent filmmakers like us to have our voices and creativity heard in mainstream media.

IMDB Link

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3392438/?ref_=tt_ov_dr

Facebook Handle

https://www.facebook.com/subhrajit.mitra.18

Twitter Handle

Tweets by SubhrajitMitra

👁 98 Views
Powered by SgAiSolution

Share this post

Total shares: 0

Editor's Choice

Ajay Devgn’s Crime Patrol Gamble: Star Power on a TV Budget

Published

14 hours ago

September 9, 2026

Johal

Ajay Devgn’s Crime Patrol Gamble: Star Power on a TV Budget

Share this post

Total shares: 0

Balle Balle Radio™ Entertainment Desk

A Bollywood A-lister fronting a long-running true-crime show has split opinion between those who see smart cross-platform economics and those who see a mismatch nobody asked for. Meanwhile, a crowded slate of remakes, mythologicals and comedy sequels raises a quieter question about where Hindi cinema’s creative energy is actually going.

Ajay Devgn hosting a true-crime television show sounds, on paper, like a minor career footnote. In practice, it has become one of the more revealing small controversies in recent Hindi entertainment news — not because of what Devgn said or did, but because of what his presence on the show exposes about how stardom, television economics and audience expectation now collide.

Crime Patrol, the long-running Sony reality crime series, aired its new season with Devgn as host, replacing the format’s more familiar anchors. The reaction was swift and largely unflattering. Viewers who follow the show closely — people who know its rhythms, its previous hosts, its particular tone — reportedly found Devgn’s presence jarring, describing him online as a poor fit for the format. Whether that reaction represents a broad consensus or a vocal subset of the show’s fanbase is hard to verify from social commentary alone, but the sentiment appears to be more than a fringe complaint.

Two explanations are circulating for why Devgn took the job at all. One is promotional: that his real interest lies in keeping Drishyam 3 in the conversation. The other, more plausible explanation, is simpler — the reported fee. Devgn is said to have been paid in the range of 90 crore for roughly 15 episodes, which works out to about 6 crore per episode. If accurate, that is a substantial sum for television work, and it would make the financial logic behind his involvement fairly straightforward, whatever the promotional side-benefits might be.

This is not Devgn’s first move into episodic television. He appeared in Rudra: The Edge of Darkness in 2022, a six-episode series that was reasonably well received. That prior experiment suggests his interest in the format isn’t new or purely mercenary — but Crime Patrol is a different animal. It’s a long-running procedural built around a specific host identity, not a limited prestige drama. Reports have also circulated that the show’s regular episodes weren’t being shot with Devgn directly involved in the way viewers might assume, though this detail remains unconfirmed chatter rather than established fact.

A Question of Fit, Not Talent

Nobody seriously disputes Devgn’s abilities as an actor. The criticism isn’t about talent — it’s about context. A major film star stepping into a format built for a different kind of on-screen presence can create a genuine tonal mismatch, independent of how good that star is in his own lane. That’s a fair critical observation. Whether it justifies the intensity of the online reaction is a separate question. Trolling tends to amplify disproportionately, and one bad-fit casting decision doesn’t necessarily reflect on Devgn’s judgment or career trajectory — it may simply reflect a producer’s decision that didn’t quite land with the show’s existing audience.

There’s also a reasonable reading that positions this as a short-term, transactional move rather than a long-term pivot: a well-paid guest-hosting stint that generates conversation, whether positive or negative, while a bigger film franchise stays in the news cycle alongside it. If that was the calculation, the backlash may be beside the point — the show got attention, the fee got paid, and Devgn moves on to whatever comes next, likely with a returning regular host restoring the format to its usual rhythm.

Same Well, Different Buckets

Zoom out from Devgn’s TV cameo and a larger pattern comes into view. Hindi cinema’s upcoming slate leans heavily on the familiar: sequels, remakes and mythological epics, often announced well before scripts or casts are finalised.

Akshay Kumar’s schedule illustrates the point well. He’s reportedly attached to a Priyadarshan-directed film inspired by Jim Corbett, positioned as a comic thriller and possibly his landmark 99th release before a planned 100th film — though which project claims that milestone remains unsettled. Alongside that sits Anees Bazmee’s next, a Golmaal 5 in development, and a Rohit Shetty film where Kumar is said to be playing a substantial villain role. Notably absent from any recent update is Hera Pheri 3, a project that has generated more announcement noise than actual movement.

The volume of Akshay Kumar productions in the pipeline raises a fair industry question: can output at this scale consistently deliver on story and content, or does quantity eventually work against quality? It’s not an accusation against any single film — it’s a structural concern about an industry that rewards volume and franchise recognition over the slower work of original storytelling.

A similar tension shows up in two upcoming comedies: Kunal Kemmu’s "Waaie" and a Kareena Kapoor–Prithviraj Sukumaran film reportedly heading toward a Part 2. Early teasers for the Kemmu film generated real anticipation — comparisons to his earlier hit Madgaon Express set expectations for sharp, background-driven comic writing. The subsequent trailer, by several accounts, didn’t fully deliver on that promise, landing as more conventional than the black-comedy tone the teaser implied. That’s a meaningful gap between marketing and material, and it’s worth watching whether the finished film closes it.

The Kareena Kapoor–Prithviraj project carries its own layer of confusion: persistent chatter has framed it as a remake, a claim both the director and Prithviraj have reportedly pushed back on, insisting the story is original. Public awareness of the film itself appears limited — a handful of influencers discussing the trailer doesn’t necessarily translate into broad audience registration that the film exists at all, which is its own marketing problem regardless of the story’s originality.

Adding to the release-calendar puzzle, both films are reportedly scheduled around the Ganesh Chaturthi festival period, a timing choice that has drawn skepticism given how competitive and unpredictable festival-season release slots tend to be in the Hindi market.

The Mythological Rush

Elsewhere, the mythological genre continues attracting major names and major money. A new project centered on Krishna, reportedly involving NTR-adjacent casting discussions before settling on other talent, is being backed by a production house better known for lighter, romantic "candy floss" films — a notable departure that will be worth watching for how the tonal shift is handled. Multiple Krishna-themed projects appear to be in parallel development industry-wide, suggesting a genre cycle rather than a single studio bet.

Studio Perspective

What connects Devgn’s Crime Patrol detour to the pile-up of remakes, sequels and mythologicals isn’t really about any one project’s quality. It’s about an industry currently more comfortable trading on recognisable names and formats than building anticipation from scratch. A star’s television cameo, a fifth instalment of a comedy franchise, a mythological epic backed by a studio pivoting from its usual genre — these are all, in their own way, bets placed on familiarity doing the marketing work that fresh storytelling used to do.

That’s not inherently a failure of ambition. Familiar formats can still produce good work, and audience appetite for comfort viewing is real and valid — it shouldn’t be dismissed as lazy taste. But when trailers underdeliver against teasers, when audiences can’t tell if a film is a remake or an original, and when a bankable star’s fee becomes the most concrete piece of information available about a project, it suggests the industry is currently prioritising the transaction over the story. The reaction to Devgn’s Crime Patrol stint may be less about him personally and more about audiences sensing, correctly or not, that a decision was made for reasons that had little to do with what would serve the show itself.

The more interesting question isn’t whether any single casting choice or sequel announcement was a mistake. It’s whether an industry can keep leaning on recognisable faces and familiar intellectual property indefinitely before audiences start asking what happened to the original ideas that built those stars and formats in the first place.

image : INSTAGRAM

— Studio CarryOnHarry Editorial Desk

Read more People’s Choice stories on Studio CarryOnHarry. Reporting via Live News Vault.

👁 20 Views
Powered by SgAiSolution

Bajpayee Transforms Into Gandhi in Sudhir Mishra’s Next

Bajpayee Transforms Into Gandhi in Sudhir Mishra's Next Studio CarryOnHarry Entertainment Desk | 6 September 2026 A Historic Casting Decision…

The Mismatch Problem: How Toxic Tried to Serve Too Many Masters at Once

Balle Balle Radio™ Entertainment Desk The most telling detail in this discussion isn't a plot complaint. It's a process confession.…

Dulquer’s I’m Game Loses Ground on Day 2 as Footfall Fails to Match Screens

Dulquer's I'm Game Loses Ground on Day 2 as Footfall Fails to Match Screens Studio CarryOnHarry Entertainment Desk | 5…

Mirzapur: The Movie Day 1 — Rs. 29.70 Crore Gross Beats Projections, But Weekend Hold Is the Real Verdict

Mirzapur: The Movie Day 1 — Rs. 29.70 Crore Gross Beats Projections, But Weekend Hold Is the Real VerdictMassMasala —…

The OTT Gatekeepers Said No. Then ₹61 Crore Said Otherwise.

The OTT Gatekeepers Said No. Then ₹61 Crore Said Otherwise. Studio CarryOnHarry Entertainment Desk | 5 September 2026 From Boardroom…

‘Hanuman Anshakar’ Proves Patient Audiences Still Value Spiritual Storytelling Over Star Power

Balle Balle Radio™ Entertainment Desk The low-budget devotional title "Hanuman Anshakar" has seen audience growth by its fourth week, outpacing…

Share this post

Total shares: 0

Editor's Choice

Bajpayee Transforms Into Gandhi in Sudhir Mishra’s Next

Published

3 days ago

September 6, 2026

Johal

Bajpayee Transforms Into Gandhi in Sudhir Mishra’s Next

Share this post

Total shares: 0

Bajpayee Transforms Into Gandhi in Sudhir Mishra’s Next

Studio CarryOnHarry Entertainment Desk | 6 September 2026

A Historic Casting Decision for Bollywood

One of Hindi cinema’s most decorated actors, Manoj Bajpayee, is preparing to step into the shoes of the Father of the Nation. The acclaimed performer will portray Mahatma Gandhi on screen for the very first time in an upcoming directorial by veteran filmmaker Sudhir Mishra.

Lead instead with a specific observation about what the image shows — gesture, costume, expression — rather than restating that an image exists and people reacted. Ground it in a detail, not a summary.

The Story Behind the Film

What makes this project particularly compelling is its unique historical lens. Reframe around a question or tension rather than restating the fact: e.g., ‘Which 21 days? The production hasn’t said — and that silence is itself part of the intrigue around this project.’

Joining Bajpayee on screen is the celebrated Saurabh Shukla, who takes on a key role in the narrative. The pairing of two powerhouse performers promises an intense and layered cinematic experience.

Creative Team and Production Details

Director: Sudhir Mishra — known for acclaimed works including Dharavi (1992), Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi (2003), Chameli (2004), and Serious Men (2020)
Producer: Anubhav Sinha and Narendra Hirawat
Production Banner: Benaras Mediaworks
Presented By: NH Studioz

The reunion of Mishra and Sinha — two stalwarts who have individually shaped the landscape of meaningful Indian cinema — adds significant creative weight to the venture. For the latest on Bollywood’s top stories, stay tuned to our dedicated coverage hub.

Bajpayee’s Most Daring Role Yet?

Manoj Bajpayee has consistently pushed boundaries throughout his career, from Satya to The Family Man. Yet portraying Mahatma Gandhi — arguably one of the most recognised and revered figures in world history — represents an entirely new frontier for the National Award-winning actor.

The responsibility of embodying Gandhi’s physicality, philosophy, and presence on screen is immense. Early reactions to the first-look image suggest Bajpayee has already made a powerful impression, even before a single frame of footage has been officially released.

Gandhi on Screen: A Rich Legacy

The role of Mahatma Gandhi has previously been portrayed by Ben Kingsley in Richard Attenborough’s landmark 1982 film Gandhi, and by Naseeruddin Shah in Kamal Haasan’s Hey Ram. Bajpayee’s interpretation promises to bring a fresh and distinctly Indian perspective to one of history’s most complex and beloved figures.

As entertainment industry coverage continues to track this project, anticipation is building rapidly across the film fraternity and among audiences nationwide.

What to Expect Next

An official title, release timeline, and further production details are yet to be announced. Given the calibre of talent involved both in front of and behind the camera, this film is shaping up to be one of the most significant Bollywood releases in recent memory.

– Entertainment Desk, Studio Carry On Harry

Background & Timeline

Manoj Bajpayee has been a cornerstone of Indian parallel cinema since his breakthrough in Satya (1998). Director Sudhir Mishra, meanwhile, has built a distinguished career spanning over three decades with films like Dharavi (1992), Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi (2003), and Serious Men (2020). Producer Anubhav Sinha’s Benaras Mediaworks has backed several socially conscious films in recent years. This project marks the first time Bajpayee will portray Mahatma Gandhi, joining a select group of actors including Ben Kingsley and Naseeruddin Shah who have taken on the historic role.

Studio CarryOnHarry Perspective

At Studio Carry On Harry, we believe this casting is a watershed moment for Indian historical cinema. Manoj Bajpayee brings an unparalleled raw intensity to every role, and his portrayal of Mahatma Gandhi could redefine how Bollywood approaches biographical storytelling. Paired with Sudhir Mishra’s unflinching directorial vision and Anubhav Sinha’s commitment to meaningful narratives, this film has the potential to transcend entertainment and become genuine cultural documentation. We’ll be watching every development closely.

What’s Next?

Watch for the official title announcement and theatrical release date from the Benaras Mediaworks team. A full trailer reveal and further cast announcements are expected in the coming months. Given the historical subject matter and the creative powerhouse behind the camera, this film is likely to generate significant awards season conversation well ahead of its release.

Harry Johal’s Take — Studio CarryOnHarry

The 21-day framing is the most interesting editorial pressure point here, and the draft lets it slide past as atmosphere. Sudhir Mishra has spent thirty years making films about the India that official history edits out — so the real question isn’t whether this period is ‘untold,’ but why Mishra chose this particular window, and what that choice reveals about what he thinks the Gandhi mythology is still hiding. Until we know which 21 days, calling this a watershed moment is premature; the casting is bold, but the story is still a closed door.

Editor’s Verdict

Portraying Gandhi is not acting — it is accountability. Every gesture, every syllable, every frame will be measured against one of the most documented lives in human history, and audiences will not be forgiving of shortcuts. What makes this casting genuinely interesting is that Bajpayee brings no mythology to protect. Unlike stars who guard their image carefully, he has built a career on disappearing completely into characters — and that particular discipline may be exactly what this role demands. Sudhir Mishra’s decision to focus on an unexplored 21-day window is also shrewd; it sidesteps the shadow of Attenborough’s 1982 landmark rather than competing with it. The first-look reaction tells you something important: when a single image stops a scroll, the film has already done something right. Beyond the headlines, the real test will not be whether Bajpayee resembles Gandhi, but whether he makes audiences forget they are watching an actor at all.

Enjoyed this story? Follow Studio CarryOnHarry at carryonharry.com · Sources cross-checked via livenewsvault.com · 👍 Facebook · X · 📢 Share this story

—

👁 62 Views
Powered by SgAiSolution