Connect with us

People's Choice

Rajkummar Rao’s *Maalik*: Action Triumph or Misfire?

H Johal

Published

on

Rajkummar Rao’s *Maalik*: Action Triumph or Misfire?

Critical and public reaction to Rajkummar Rao’s action role in *Maalik* (July 11, 2025) is varied. Some applaud his transformation, others find him lacking the charisma of a true action hero. A detailed analysis reveals more.


Studio Team CarryOnHarry, July 16, 2025

The reception to Rajkummar Rao’s venture into action as a gangster in *Maalik* (released July 11, 2025) is a polarized affair, drawing from diverse reviews and social media reactions. While certain quarters applaud his dramatic metamorphosis and acting prowess, others argue he doesn’t quite embody the larger-than-life, charismatic figure that typically defines action heroes within commercial cinema.

A comprehensive assessment of public sentiment reveals:

### Positive Repercussions

* Versatility and Compelling Intensity: Both fans and critics acknowledge Rao’s daring departure from his conventional comedic and dramatic roles, embracing a raw, merciless gangster persona. The initial teaser, depicting him in a violent act coupled with the declaration, “*Maalik paida nahi hue toh kya hua? Maalik ban toh sakte hai*,” ignited considerable anticipation. Social media platforms, especially Reddit, brimmed with comments celebrating his “fierce” and “never-before-seen avatar,” such as, “Acting level Rajkummar Rao is on fire” and “Damn this looks good. 🔥🔥🔥🔥”.

* Powerful Performance: Critics have highlighted Rao’s capacity to anchor the film through a visceral, rage-driven portrayal. Reviews on IMDb commend him as a “haunting presence who owns every frame,” applauding his skill in transforming hackneyed gangster clichés into engaging, character-centric narratives. Hindustan Times also praised his “fiery energy,” asserting his ability to transcend the film’s shortcomings.

* Enthusiasm for Genre Exploration: Platforms such as Reddit and Instagram saw fans eagerly welcoming Rao’s exploration of a new genre, particularly after successes in *Srikanth*, *Mr. & Mrs. Mahi*, and *Stree 2*. Remarks such as “He’s bringing contents back to back” and “A big leap from Stree and Stree 2” underline the admiration for his versatility and experimental spirit.

### Negative Feedback

* Deficiency in “Mass” Appeal: A prevalent criticism revolves around Rao’s perceived lack of the inherent swagger or larger-than-life magnetism often associated with commercial action heroes. Gulte’s critique pointed out, “There was no style or swag or anything that we associate with a ‘mass’ hero in a commercial film, in Rajkummar Rao’s persona,” insinuating that his performance appeared strained within the demanding gangster role. This sentiment was echoed by some Reddit users.

* Predictable Narrative Hampering Performance: Reviewers noted that the film’s reliance on a tired, predictable narrative undermined Rao’s potential impact. India.com commented that his endeavor to embody a ruthless gangster “did not live up to expectations,” feeling restrained and failing to evoke the iconic intensity of characters. Koimoi similarly observed that despite Rao’s technical expertise, he “lacks the impact of actors more successful and trained in such anti-hero roles.”

* Concerns Over Miscasting: Certain reviews and audience reactions suggest that Rao was ill-suited for the gangster role. Gulte explicitly stated, “Rajkummar Rao is a very good actor… However, he’s miscast in the role. The character like *Maalik* commands the actor to possess inbuilt swag.”

### Mixed Reviews

* Potent Performance, Flawed Story: Many appreciate Rao’s commitment and technical proficiency yet lament the film’s uninspired script and direction. The Hindu described *Maalik* as “less than the sum of its parts,” highlighting that while Rao delivers a commendable performance, the predictable plot and inconsistent pacing diminish its overall effect. IMDb reviews echoed this, labeling the film a “formulaic slog” heavily reliant on Rao’s grounded performance.

* Supporting Actors Stealing the Show: Some reviews spotlighted the supporting cast, such as Anshumaan Pushkar and Prosenjit Chatterjee, as eclipsing the lead’s performance. Koimoi lauded Pushkar as the “loyal lieutenant” who shines brightest, while Chatterjee’s portrayal of an encounter specialist injected novelty into a familiar character. This suggests that while Rao’s performance garnered attention, it wasn’t always the primary focus of admiration.

* Commercial Expectations Unmet: There is a prevailing sentiment that *Maalik*, in its aspiration to capture the Hindi market’s affinity for action entertainers reminiscent of *KGF* and *Pushpa*, ultimately fell short. The film’s opening day earnings of ₹4.02 crores, trailing behind Rao’s previous release *Bhool Chuk Maaf* (₹7 crores), indicate a lackluster audience response.

### Conclusion

Public perception of Rajkummar Rao’s introduction into the action sphere in *Maalik* is complex, marked by both admiration and skepticism. While followers and critics applaud his willingness to venture beyond familiar territory, others contend that his portrayal doesn’t possess the commanding charisma intrinsic to a gangster role. The general view holds that while Rao’s technical execution is competent, *Maalik* does not firmly establish him as a credible action figure akin to Bollywood’s iconic gangsters, with the supporting cast and technical elements frequently drawing greater attention.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editor's Choice

Bollywood Under the Influence: How Paid Media Distorts Reality

H Johal

Published

on

By

Balle Balle Radio Entertainment Desk

 

December 31, 2025

 

Bollywood Under the Influence: How Paid Media Distorts Reality

 

## Bollywood’s Battle for Authenticity: Unmasking Paid Media’s Influence

 

**Mumbai, India** – The dazzling world of Bollywood is facing a reckoning as concerns mount over the increasing reliance on paid media and fabricated publicity. Veteran journalists and industry insiders are sounding the alarm, warning that these practices are eroding the very foundation of authenticity upon which the Indian film industry was built. The shift, they say, is creating a distorted reality for both the stars and the audiences who adore them.

 

The core issue, according to a recent panel discussion among industry experts, centers on the curated image. Celebrities and studios are increasingly investing in paid channels to shape their public perception. This involves filling press events with paid attendees and strategically cultivated fan clubs, manufacturing an atmosphere of overwhelming adoration, as opposed to genuine engagement with critical media. One panelist bluntly stated this trend replaces authentic dialogue: “You want your applause, so you gather people like that.”

 

This calculated approach, the panel argued, directly undermines the role of traditional journalism. Critical analysis is being sidelined in favor of public relations-driven narratives. Audiences are left with a skewed understanding of films, talent, and overall quality. The rise of paid reviews, both positive and negative, further muddies the waters. This makes it exceedingly difficult for the public to distinguish between genuine opinions and strategically manufactured hype. A panelist revealed the open secret: “Positive reviews are paid for, negative reviews are paid for,” highlighting the pervasiveness of the issue.

 

Panelists pointed to examples such as Shah Rukh Khan’s pioneering use of lavish hotel halls reserved for fan clubs on his birthday. They argue that while such displays generate immediate validation, prioritizing them over genuine skill development ultimately harms the industry. One panelist warned, “You are killing yourselves with your own hands,” underscoring the long-term consequences of prioritizing image over substance.

 

The consensus among experts is clear: the over-reliance on paid media poses a significant threat to the long-term viability of Bollywood. By prioritizing image over artistic integrity and genuine storytelling, the industry risks losing touch with its audience. The challenge now is whether Bollywood can reclaim its authenticity and reconnect with the core values that once defined it, or if it will continue down a path of manufactured hype and distorted realities.

Continue Reading

Editor's Choice

Inside Bollywood’s Silence: The Real Reason Dhurandhar Isn’t Being Celebrated

H Johal

Published

on

By

Inside Bollywood’s Silence: The Real Reason Dhurandhar Isn’t Being Celebrated

 

In a season where Bollywood films are loudly pushed, praised, and plastered across every digital corner, the curious silence surrounding Dhurandhar has raised more questions than answers. Social media has been buzzing with talk of nepotism, PR politics, and manipulated corporate bookings. But industry insiders tell a very different story—one that has less to do with individuals, and everything to do with genre power, studio territory, and the fragile ego structure of Bollywood’s biggest players.

 

At the heart of the storm lies a simple fact: Dhurandhar is a spy thriller. Not just any thriller—the genre Bollywood unofficially considers the exclusive territory of Yash Raj Films. For over a decade, YRF has aggressively built its “Spy Universe,” treating it like a cinematic fortress. The studio’s identity, revenue expectations, and long-term franchise planning are deeply tied to the success of this genre. So when War 2—their highly anticipated blockbuster—released earlier this year and struggled at the box office, it didn’t just bruise egos; it shook the foundation of the Spy Universe itself.

 

Against this backdrop, the arrival of Dhurandhar became a complication no one at YRF wanted. Insiders insist the silence around it isn’t about actor rivalries or PR games. It’s far more strategic. Publicly celebrating another studio’s spy thriller—especially one gaining genuine praise—would inevitably weaken the narrative YRF is trying to rebuild with its upcoming film Alpha. Acknowledging Dhurandhar would mean accepting a new, strong competitor in the very space YRF claims as its own.

 

There’s also the added complexity of personalities. Industry veterans quietly acknowledge the friction between “Gangu” and certain YRF loyalists. Some believe that any hype around Dhurandhar will reflect indirectly on Ranveer Singh, an actor who has been caught in the crosshairs of shifting alliances and subtle jabs from prominent names. Even recent comments by Filmfare’s Jitesh Pillai, insiders say, were not random—they were part of the larger mood within the establishment.

 

What is particularly telling is that this silence cannot be explained by corporate bookings or inflated footfall numbers. Brahmāstra pioneered and benefitted from such tactics, yet it received full-throated celebration from every camp. The absence of similar support for Dhurandhar points clearly to the genre politics at play.

 

Behind-the-scenes tea also hints at larger ripples: whispers of Deepika Padukone stepping away from an Ayan Mukerji–Ranbir Kapoor project have surfaced, possibly tied to the tense undercurrents created by this power struggle. Whether these developments are temporary or signal a deeper fissure will become clearer in the coming months.

 

For now, what remains undeniable is the industry’s discomfort. Dhurandhar is being quietly acknowledged as a good film—good enough to challenge the supremacy of the Spy Universe itself. And in a world where brand territories matter more than merit, silence has become a weapon.

 

As Bollywood inches toward the release of Alpha, expect the temperature to rise, alliances to shift, and narratives to be aggressively shaped. Because in this battle, it isn’t actors fighting for acclaim—it’s studios fighting for genre dominance.

 

Continue Reading

Trending