Interviews
Music Talks with Aaron J. Trumm ” Stronger Together “
Currently Aaron sings, raps, generates, blends as well as creates.
Tell us about yourself ?
I’m Aaron J. Trumm – and that’s my act name 🙂 I’m from Albuquerque, NM, USA – I’ve also lived in Houston, TX, Oakland, CA, Austin, TX and even Denmark for about 3 months.
Goals in life? You know the older you get the more those change and swirl – but I’d say I’m still all about moving and inspiring people.
How long you been in performing arts ? Share some details of initial days / learning days / experimenting days to grow to BE WHAT YOU ARE TODAY
I’ve been making records nearly 28 years, and I’ve been on stages in various forms for almost that long. I started off in the studio thinking that I would never get on stage, but discovering slam poetry changed that – long ago – many moons (2002), I ended up being the 10th ranked slam poet in the world. That experience, and at the same time being an actor in a comedy gunfight show, really shaped me as a performer and made me believe that the number one goal of performing is connection. I don’t really care too much what the format is – whether I’m rapping or singing, saying a poem, or just talking to a room full of people – the point is to have a conversation (or a monologue!) and try to connect, communicate, and maybe move the energy in the room to a better plane.
What was most attractive part for you to be in this industry ?
Nothing about this industry is attractive to me, if I’m honest. The INDUSTRY is brutal, and probably the most unrealistic way to try to make money I can think of. It’s not the industry that’s attractive. It’s the work. It’s the work of creating and transcending and communicating, right?
Business-wise, whatever. It’s awesome when you find great collaborators. And yes getting off a stage when everyone is going apeshit, or winning a national level poetry slam, or having people tell you something you did moved them to tears – those things are really great. And I think ultimately one of the goals we all have more than money is fame – to be frank. Because a big part of the dream is to say something – to have a song or a book or a poem or whatever – that becomes part of the lexicon. Part of the culture at large. And then to go to work every day knowing that what you do really matters to people. Money of course is just an indicator of that. Not the end goal – not that I wouldn’t take 50 million dollars. 🙂 Of course once you do realize you’re doing something that matters – there’s a big pressure there. It’s easy to want to self sabotage, not promote, not show up – like me in the beginning not even want pictures taken of you – just in case what you’re doing is bad or you’re saying the wrong thing.
Share some experiences ( good or bad ) any that made you grow in life or profession ?
There’s been a whole line of mentors and partners in my career, all of which have made me what I am today – from my first recording mentors Manny and Rock to mentors in Film and TV like (another) Manny and Dale and fellow performers like Rodney and Tamara and Marcel (a bassist and two slam poets), to all of the many slam poets and actors I worked with to now a days my life partner (aka girlfriend of many many years) Sandra to probably most closest male friend Larry – those two people have really held me to account to be better and to communicate more clearly. My buddy D’Santi and his wife CC and the members of Una Mas and Underground Cadence – bands that I’ve done a good bit of singing with – they’ve really been inspiring too.
Slam is a hell of an experience too. when you have to get those scores, and the way you have to do is move touch inspire someone you’ve never met before in your life – you learn really quickly what works and what doesn’t. And how and why to care about other people.
Who inspired you ? How do you work on creating your own signature style ? How do you analyze all this to be known as you and BE YOU ?
Responding to the pressure trying to find the “right sound” while also staying true to your own changing self while also listening to the needs of other people – especially industry personnel – can be super overwhelming. I tend to follow whatever the hell I want, and that’s not always helpful. In a practical sense, my process always includes a vetting process – whether it’s a new poem for slam or a new song, early versions are presented in safe spaces – like to a couple of key people – Larry and Sandra, if you want specifics. What they say causes revisions, and then more and then more. Before I had them, it was the fellow slam poets and open mic community.
The main thing is I don’t analyze per se. I follow inspiration, and I try not to cling to a creation. If it keeps passing each gauntlet and getting good feedback, it gets a wider and wider exposure. once it’s out and circulating, I’m on to something else. Generally, what you see of me on video or audio recordings is a snapshot of the past. (obviously)
What do you want to convey through your music?
Possibility. That anything is possible. Transcendence and inspiration and love and maybe just a little fuck you to those who hold too much power.
Story behind making of your new track / Album?
I remember I shared with you guys the song Stronger Together – funny thing about that one. It’s the first one I’ve succeeded at emulating the sound of something else at the request of a company. I was emulating something of mine so that made it easier. An old ice hockey teammate from college now has a company, GreenRope – and he heard a song of mine called Happy Every Day and another one called Don’t Stop – he said he liked those and he asked me to writing something he could use for his company’s anthem – basically it was a licensing agreement. He said I don’t need a jingle – I want you to just do something that’s you, and then maybe throw in the word green LOL So I asked him what his core values were and I really took to the idea that we’re stronger when we get together – that’s really core to his company’s thinking. So I took a rif I’d been playing on the piano which I knew could be a cool song but hadn’t found out how yet… and then the next day I sat in the bathroom at night while Sandra slept and I wrote these lyrics. I wrote verse one and then I came to the studio and wrote a chorus to the chorus of the piano thing – then a second verse – just trying to keep these concepts in mind… and all of a sudden I liked it. My bass buddy Rodney wasn’t available, so I had to do that myself – but my buddy Nathan the drummer threw down some drums, I got a guy named Paul to do some horns – and while I was on the road for a medical appointment at Stanford, CA (long story) I edited those horns up and got excited – next thing I knew I had a mix and Lars (from GreenRope) loved it! And I liked it too so I released it!
Any interesting trivia about making of song ?
I think I kind of covered that in the story – but one thing is that the horns were simpler – Paul gave me a pretty simple riff and I felt like it needed more, but he had given me some other licks toward the end – so I actually strategically edited so it sounds like he played some licks in spots he didn’t 🙂 🙂 the magic of editing! Lars was the one that asked for the spoken word intro – I wouldn’t have thought to do that and I was skeptical but I thought well what’s the harm in trying, I can always erase it – and actually I don’t mind that part at all.
People who you would like to thank ?
It’s really hard to do a proper thank you list because really the list is so so long and I don’t want to leave anybody out. Even the question about inspiration about was hard and I’ve left way too many people out. What we used to do is put this little logo of a little red hen on our records. That was sort of like, if you know you know. But basically it was the story of the red hen who made bread – who will help me sow this wheat? she would say. “not I” said the wolf “not I said the goose” – etc. who will help me cut the wheat – mash the wheat – bake the bread… nobody helped and as I say the story now it’s sort of negative like you think nobody helped you. In reality SO SO SO MANY people helped me and us. So I guess the red hen now would just be a kind of “hey thanks everybody” thing. you know who you are. and if I’m ever in the room with you – I should really be sure to thank you.
People who you would like to work with and people you idolize to be like professionally ?
Great question. I dunno. I really would have to meet somebody first to know. I always idolized Zach de la Rocha – but now I don’t buy the idea that anger is such a great gift. I’ve changed. There’s one guy I’d love to work with AGAIN – I’ve technically worked with him LOL Bob Balaban. He’s a director and an actor and you’ve seen him in a lot of things I guarantee it. He’s the rich father in a show called “The Politician” right now on Netflix. I was a featured extra – piano player – in an episode of a show called Greeves – grieves? with Nick Nolte. Bob was directing that episode and he was super easy going and professional and I’d really love to act in something with him directing or acting or both.
Where do you see your music 3 years from now ?
Who fucking knows. I’m really just hoping I’ll be alive and super healthy then. Hopefully COVID won’t be so dangerous and I can do something on stage again, but I don’t know what. My big dream musically is always to get a kick ass group together and present the best of my recorded stuff in a world class way as a real SHOW – not just half ass playing songs. So maybe that?
How would you like to stretch your boundaries of genre in future projects ?
I can never know how I’m going to stretch the boundaries – but I know that I will. I really never fit the genre or “soundalike” that I’m going for – but I’m actually loving the idea of a sort of ska and latin influence – like the song Stronger Together and Happy Every Day – I would love to bounce around on stage with a horn section and the band and be doing that – because it’s super not ska, and it’s super not rap, and it’s super not rock, and it’s super not latin music – but it’s also super all of those. sort of.
Message for Fans and listeners.
Here’s the deal. I’m not as ambitious as I once was. My company name is NQuit and that stands for Never Never Quit – but I’m not necessarily all about that now. If you hate something, or if the dream you thought you had turns out to suck – quit. The most important thing in the world is health and happiness. Not just yours, but the people around you. So even I’ve always thought a life best lived is not one which seeks to be normal and safe and make money doing something you hate – I also think art is the not the be all end all thing, and suffering for your art is just immature.
Love, health, vitality, and happiness. These are the things that I think you should be trying to create for yourself and your people – and your audience. And I think if you can do that, and you wanna be famous and do it for everybody – great! Or if you just do it for your grandma – also great. But just be committed to that light.
Website Link
https://aarontrumm.com/
Facebook Handle
https://facebook.com/AaronJTrumm
Twitter Handle
Instagram Handle
https://instagram.com/AaronJTrumm
Spotify Handle
Powered by SgAiSolution
Interviews
Long Beach Actor Ray Buffer Plays Villain in Sci-Fi Western Short at New Local Film Festival
Long Beach character actor Ray Buffer takes on a villain role in "The Lord of All Future Space and Time," a sci-fi western short screening as part of the inaugural Long Beach Film Festival, according to the announcement.
The festival marks the first edition of a new event on the city’s cultural calendar, running August 28 and 29 at the historic Art Theatre in Long Beach’s Retro Row district, according to festival promotion. The short screens Saturday, August 29, at noon, according to the announcement and other festival listings.
Buffer is a Long Beach-based character actor whose work spans decades, with a resume that includes western villains, mobsters and more nuanced parts in historical docudramas, according to background material on his career. He’s described as known for a commanding presence and a deep voice, traits that line up with the villain role he plays in this short. His social media has also referenced involvement in a separate sci-fi animated short tied to the festival’s opening, though it’s not clear from available material whether that refers to the same project or a different one screening the same weekend.
No director, cast list beyond Buffer, or plot synopsis for "The Lord of All Future Space and Time" was included in the announcement. Ticket and program details for the full festival lineup were not specified in the material provided.
Powered by SgAiSolution
Interviews
Tagore Almeida discusses the deeply personal journey behind SALIGIA
SALIGIA: Tagore Almeida on the Seven Deadly Sins, the Virtues Within Us, and the War We Fight Inside
In conversation with Studio CarryOnHarry, author Tagore Almeida discusses the deeply personal journey behind SALIGIA, a mythological fantasy that turns an ancient framework of vice into an exploration of courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love.
For centuries, the seven deadly sins have provided a vocabulary for examining human weakness. Pride, envy, anger, greed, lust, excess and apathy have appeared across religious teaching, philosophy and culture in different forms.
But what happens when we stop asking only what is wrong with us—and begin asking what already exists within us to confront those weaknesses?
That question sits at the heart of SALIGIA.
Drawing upon an ancient Latin mnemonic traditionally associated with the seven deadly sins, author and filmmaker Tagore Almeida turns the familiar structure on its head. Instead of building his story solely around human failings, he constructs a symbolic world around seven countervailing virtues: courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love.
For Almeida, the idea is also deeply personal. Born Catholic in Goa before life took him through Britain, the Middle East and Asia, his encounters with different cultures, beliefs and people gradually led him to question whether the behaviours traditionally described as “sins” belong to any one religion at all—or simply to humanity.
In this conversation with Studio CarryOnHarry, Almeida talks about the origins of SALIGIA, why a house became central to its mythology, how the external and internal battles of the story intersect, and why he ultimately came to believe that virtue may be less about becoming someone new than remembering something already within us.
Studio CarryOnHarry: SALIGIA takes its title from a Latin mnemonic traditionally associated with the seven deadly sins, yet your novel uses that framework to explore virtue. What drew you personally to this piece of theological history?
Tagore Almeida: What fascinated me about SALIGIA was never really the religious label attached to it. It was the humanity hiding underneath.
Harry, I was born Catholic in Goa, so the idea of the seven deadly sins was part of the landscape I grew up with. Over time, I became disillusioned with certain aspects of organised religion, but Catholicism remained part of my cultural and emotional foundation. So SALIGIA was familiar territory.
Then life took me elsewhere—Britain, the Middle East, Asia—and I found myself genuinely connecting with people of many different faiths, and with people of no faith at all.
I became curious. Were these so-called “deadly sins” uniquely Christian ideas, or were they simply human behaviours that religions had given different names to?
The more I looked, the more I realised that pride, envy, anger, greed, lust, excess and apathy appear in one form or another almost everywhere—sometimes through religion, sometimes through philosophy, and sometimes simply through culture and family. Apparently, humanity has been remarkably consistent in its weaknesses.
But eventually a more interesting question occurred to me. Instead of continually asking, “What is wrong with us?” I began wondering, “What already exists within us that can confront what is wrong?”
That changed the book completely.
I have always been fascinated by the invisible parts of human beings—compassion, courage, kindness. Whether I am writing fiction, making a film, recording a podcast or attempting poetry, I seem to arrive, rather annoyingly, at the same question:
Who are we when nobody is watching?
SALIGIA gave me an ancient framework within which to explore that. The sins gave me the architecture. The virtues gave me a reason to walk inside.
Studio CarryOnHarry: That architecture becomes quite literal in the book: an ancestral dwelling with rooms representing courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love. Why did a house become the setting for this inversion?
Tagore Almeida: A house felt natural because a house is never just architecture. It holds memory. It holds the things we proudly display in the sitting room and the things we quietly push into cupboards and hope nobody ever opens.
Human beings are rather like that. We all have rooms we happily invite people into, and other rooms we avoid ourselves.
When I began shaping SALIGIA, I also made a conscious decision not to fill the story with identifiable human characters. The moment you give someone a face, name, nationality or religion, readers naturally begin placing them into categories.
I wanted to remove those distractions as much as possible. I wanted the reader to encounter the ideas before encountering identity. So the house became the character.
Once that happened, the inversion became quite natural. Instead of seven compartments representing human failure, I imagined seven spaces representing what might stand against those failures: courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love.
The house also allowed me to explore virtue without turning the book into a seventy-five-page sermon. Nobody really wants that. I certainly wouldn’t.
I wanted readers to move through something rather than simply be told something—to open doors, enter rooms and discover what has been forgotten, neglected, protected or perhaps left waiting quietly in the dark.
In many ways, the house became a metaphor for the self.
We spend an extraordinary amount of our lives searching outside ourselves for answers—in success, possessions, religion, status, technology, relationships, recognition and approval.
We keep renovating the outside of the house.
SALIGIA quietly asks a different question: What if some of the rooms we have spent our whole lives searching for were already inside us?
Perhaps courage, compassion, humility and love are not things we need to acquire. Perhaps they are rooms we simply need to reopen.
Studio CarryOnHarry: That leads to one of the book’s central ideas—that these virtues may already exist within us. Why was that important to you?
Tagore Almeida: Because I am simply not convinced that human beings arrive as empty vessels waiting to be filled with goodness. Harry, I think we already arrive with quite a lot of it.
Look at children. Before the world starts handing them labels, they share, care and comfort one another. They are curious about animals, fascinated by nature and capable of affection without first asking what religion, race, nationality or social class somebody belongs to.
That, to me, is humanity in a fairly pure form. Then life begins adding layers.
Religion, race, politics, family, community, fear, ambition, prejudice, success—all of these begin shaping us, sometimes obviously and sometimes so quietly that we barely notice.
Watch a child comfort another child who is crying. There is no philosophy involved. No scripture. No management seminar on empathy. Something instinctive simply responds.
Perhaps life then complicates us. We accumulate ambition, fear, disappointment, comparison, possessions, prejudice, success and, if we are especially fortunate, an impressive job title to put on LinkedIn.
Somewhere along the way, we become very sophisticated at forgetting very simple things.
SALIGIA was never intended to say, “Here are seven virtues you need to acquire.” That sounded suspiciously like homework.
Instead, the book asks something gentler, but perhaps more uncomfortable:
What if you already possess them?
And if courage, compassion, humility, integrity, forgiveness, reverence and love are already somewhere within us, the real question is no longer how we acquire them.
The question becomes why, sometimes, we choose not to use them.
Studio CarryOnHarry: The subtitle draws a distinction between an external evil and an internal war. How do those two journeys intersect for Salem and Medea?
Tagore Almeida: The external journey gives the story movement. The internal journey gives it meaning.
Think of something ordinary. You hear that someone you know has spoken badly about you behind your back. That moment happens outside you. The person may move on with their day, forget about it entirely and go on to lunch.
But the hurt stays with you.
You replay it. You question the relationship. You feel anger, disappointment, perhaps even the temptation to retaliate.
The act happened outside. The battle began within.
That is very much the tension at the heart of SALIGIA.
Salem and Medea move through a world where danger appears to exist around them, so naturally they respond to what they can see. That is how most of us live. We identify the problem as the difficult person, unfair circumstance, hostile environment, institution, stranger or enemy.
Sometimes we are absolutely right. There is real cruelty, injustice and darkness in the world.
But what happens outside us also has a way of revealing what exists inside us.
Fear reveals courage. Cruelty tests compassion. Power tests humility. Betrayal tests forgiveness. Temptation tests integrity.
Once you begin looking at life that way, the outward journey and inward journey start reflecting one another.
That is really where the subtitle came from:
The evil is outside. The war is within.
We cannot control every act of cruelty, betrayal, injustice or temptation that enters our lives. But we do have some responsibility for what those experiences turn us into.
For me, that is a far more interesting battle than simply defeating a villain.
Studio CarryOnHarry: SALIGIA brings mythology, spirituality, philosophy and fantasy together. How did you prevent those elements from competing with one another?
Tagore Almeida: Very slowly.
SALIGIA first began forming in my mind sometime in the early 2010s, so it lived with me for many years before becoming a finished book. Perhaps that helped.
I never wanted to force it into existence simply because writers are apparently expected to finish things on schedule. Life, rather inconsiderately, kept happening.
I made films, went to Cannes, changed countries, built a career, raised a family, wrote other things, recorded conversations and experimented with music—and somewhere in the background, SALIGIA kept waiting.
Moving between different creative forms taught me quite a lot about how to write it.
Film teaches you that sometimes an image should do the talking. Music teaches you that silence is also part of the composition. Podcasting teaches you that people often become most interesting when you stop trying to make them sound interesting.
And writing, I discovered, requires the discipline to know when to explain and when simply to leave the door open.
Whenever the philosophy became too loud, I returned to the story. Whenever the fantasy began feeling merely decorative, I asked myself what that scene was actually saying about being human. And whenever the spiritual dimension sounded too certain, I deliberately returned to questions.
I am far more comfortable with spirituality that invites reflection than spirituality that claims to have completed the examination and obtained all the answers.
I did not want mythology to become a costume for philosophy, and I did not want philosophy to interrupt the adventure.
Ideally, one had to quietly carry the other.
The mythology builds the world. The story takes you through it. And the questions, hopefully, are what remain with you after the final page.
Studio CarryOnHarry: Spending years writing about seven vices and their opposing virtues must inevitably turn some of that examination back on the writer. Did SALIGIA change you?
Tagore Almeida: Absolutely.
Rather inconveniently, the reflection revealed how wonderfully unfinished I still am.
The danger of writing about virtue is that, at some point, the manuscript starts interviewing the author.
You write about humility, and suddenly your own ego clears its throat. You write about forgiveness, and a few names from the past appear uninvited. You write about compassion, and you have to ask whether your compassion really extends to everyone—or only to people who behave in ways you approve of.
That was probably the most personal part of writing SALIGIA. I began with ideas about vice and virtue, but eventually those ideas became mirrors.
Courage changed for me quite significantly.
We often imagine courage as something grand and cinematic—standing against armies, confronting monsters, making enormous sacrifices.
But I have come to think that some of the bravest things we do are much quieter.
Sometimes courage is admitting you were wrong. Sometimes it is apologising first. Sometimes it is asking for help. Sometimes it is refusing to become bitter.
And sometimes it is continuing to be kind when life has given you perfectly reasonable evidence that kindness may not always offer the best return on investment. That last one is particularly challenging.
But I should make one thing very clear: SALIGIA did not leave me believing that I had somehow mastered courage, humility, compassion, forgiveness or any of the virtues in the book.
Quite the opposite.
It made me realise that virtue is not something we achieve, frame and hang on the wall.
It is something we choose. Again and again.
Some days we choose rather well. Other days, spectacularly badly.
Perhaps that is part of being human. We are all works in progress, occasionally pretending to be finished products.
And tomorrow gives us another chance to do a little better.
Studio CarryOnHarry: When readers reach the final page, what do you hope they carry away from SALIGIA?
Tagore Almeida: I hope it feels quiet.
Not triumphant. Not like someone has just handed the reader seven rules for becoming a better human being.
I would much rather they close the final page, sit for a moment, and recognise something familiar inside themselves.
Maybe they remember a time when they were courageous without ever calling it courage.
Perhaps they forgave someone when anger would have been easier. Perhaps they helped a stranger and never told anyone. Perhaps they remained kind after life had given them every reason not to be.
That kind of recognition matters to me because we live in a world constantly telling us that we are incomplete.
We need more success. More money. More followers. More knowledge. More possessions. More certainty.
Apparently, somewhere out there is the final missing piece that will make us whole.
SALIGIA quietly suggests something almost unfashionable:
What if something valuable is already there?
What if, beneath the ambition, disappointment, fear, labels, noise and everything else life has placed around us, there is still a decent human being trying to remember the way home?
I do not want a reader to finish SALIGIA thinking, “Now I understand virtue.”
I would much rather they think:
“I remember that part of myself.”
Perhaps even:
“I still have that within me.”
If one reader reaches that moment, then the book has done what I hoped it would do.
Not teach them how to become good.
Simply remind them that some goodness was there all along.
Closing Note
There is an interesting contradiction at the centre of SALIGIA. Its vocabulary begins with sin, but its destination is not condemnation. It is remembrance.
Across this conversation, Tagore Almeida repeatedly returns to the idea that the most important human qualities may not be trophies to be earned or lessons to be imposed from outside. Courage can appear in an apology. Compassion can exist without doctrine. Forgiveness can happen without an audience. Integrity can be tested in moments nobody else will ever see.
Perhaps that is why the image of the house is so effective.
We spend much of our lives, as Almeida puts it, “renovating the outside”—pursuing achievement, recognition, certainty and approval. SALIGIA turns the reader towards the rooms within.
And its question is ultimately simpler than its mythology:
What if becoming better is sometimes less about finding something new—and more about remembering what we already carry?
— Studio CarryOnHarry
Powered by SgAiSolution
-
People's Choice6 days agoHaivaan Isn’t Really an Akshay Kumar Film — And That’s the Problem
-
Artists6 days agoSong 1’s New EP “What The ….” Leans Into Five Tracks of Deliberate Disorder
-
Books5 days agoNew Book from New Jersey Educator Applies Socratic Questioning to the Four Gospels
-
Authors and Artists5 days agoTaking One Step Forward and Two Steps Back? Why Your “Slow Growth” Is Actually Working
-
Editor's Choice5 days agoNetflix UK Debuts Full ‘Twilight’ Franchise and ‘Dune: Part Two’ in Major Content Drop
-
Books5 days agoCraig Fadel’s ‘The Songless Bird’ Offers Children a Message of Self-Acceptance Through Musical Metaphor
